Articles

Full-length 16S rRNA metabarcoding characterization of facial skin microbiota in acne patients: a case study in the Mekong Delta of Viet Nam

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 29 June 2026
83
Views
67
Downloads

Authors

Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the pilosebaceous unit in which skin microbiome dysbiosis plays a key pathogenic role. This study, based on full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (V1-V9), characterized facial microbial diversity in 45 participants classified as healthy (n=15), mild acne (n=15), and moderate-severe acne (n=15), using pooled samples for downstream microbiome analyses. Samples from the skin surface and sebaceous follicles were analyzed by 16S rRNA (V1-V9) sequencing using Illumina MiniSeq and processed via QIIME2. Alpha diversity (observed taxa, Shannon index), beta diversity (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA]), and biomarker taxa (linear discriminant analysis effect size [LEfSe]) were assessed. Bacillota, mainly Staphylococcus spp., predominated on the skin surface, with relative abundance increasing with acne severity, whereas follicles were dominated by Cutibacterium acnes (Actinomycetota). Follicular samples showed lower richness and Shannon diversity than surface samples, though intergroup differences were not significant. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) explained >65% of variation, revealing greater dispersion among surface communities but no clear clustering by severity (PERMANOVA p>0.3). LEfSe identified distinct bacterial biomarkers across clinical groups. Overall, site-specific microbial shifts – particularly C. acnes and Staphylococcus dysbiosis – appear central to acne development, suggesting microbiome-targeted interventions as potential therapeutic strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Preneau S, Dreno B. Female acne - a different subtype of teenager acne? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012;26:277-82.
2. Guo Z, Yang Y, Wu Q, et al. New insights into the characteristic skin microorganisms in different grades of acne and different acne sites. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1167923.
3. Dreno B, Pecastaings S, Corvec S, et al. Cutibacterium acnes (Propionibacterium acnes) and acne vulgaris: a brief look at the latest updates. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018;32:5-14.
4. Spittaels KJ, Ongena R, Zouboulis CC, et al. Cutibacterium acnes phylotype I and II strains Interact differently with human skin cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020;10:575164.
5. Byrd AL, Belkaid Y, Segre JA. The human skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2018;16:143-55.
6. Fitz-Gibbon S, Tomida S, Chiu BH, et al. Propionibacterium acnes strain populations in the human skin microbiome associated with acne. J Invest Dermatol 2013;133:2152-60.
7. McLaughlin J, Watterson S, Layton AM, et al. Propionibacterium acnes and acne vulgaris: New insights from the integration of population genetic, multi-omic, biochemical and host-microbe studies. Microorganisms 2019;7:128.
8. Brüggemann H, Salar-Vidal L, Gollnick HPM, Lood R. A janus-faced bacterium: Host-beneficial and - detrimental roles of Cutibacterium acnes. Front Microbiol 2021;12:673845.
9. Dagnelie MA, Corvec S, Saint-Jean M, et al. Cutibacterium acnes phylotypes diversity loss: A trigger for skin inflammatory process. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019;33:2340-8.
10. Niedźwiedzka A, Micallef MP, Biazzo M, Podrini C. The role of the skin microbiome in acne: Challenges and Future therapeutic opportunities. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:11422.
11. Barnard E, Shi B, Kang D, et al. The balance of metagenomic elements shapes the skin microbiome in acne and health. Sci Rep 2016;6:39491.
12. O’Neill AM, Gallo RL. Host-microbiome interactions and recent progress into understanding the biology of acne vulgaris. Microbiome 2018;6:177.
13. Kurokawa I, Layton AM, Ogawa R. Updated treatment for acne: Targeted therapy based on pathogenesis. Dermatol Ther 2021;11:1129-39.
14. Lee CH, Min M, Jin SS, Sivamani RK. Skin microbiome shifts in various dermatological conditions. J Clin Med 2025;14:6137.
15. Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011;9:244-53.
16. Regueira-Iglesias A, Balsa-Castro C, Blanco-Pintos T, Tomás I. Critical review of 16S rRNA gene sequencing workflow in microbiome studies: From primer selection to advanced data analysis. Mol Oral Microbiol 2023;38:347-99.
17. Wei Q, Li Z, Gu Z, et al. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing reveals skin microbial variability from different facial sites. Front Microbiol 2022;13:933189.
18. Mim MF, Sikder MH, Chowdhury MZH, et al. The dynamic relationship between skin microbiomes and personal care products: A comprehensive review. Heliyon 2024;10:e34549.
19. Dermnet. Acne vulgaris. 2014. Available from: https://dermnetnz.org/topics/acne-vulgaris
20. Ogai K, Nagase S, Mukai K, et al. A Comparison of Techniques for Collecting Skin Microbiome Samples: Swabbing Versus Tape-Stripping. Front Microbiol 2018;9:2362.
21. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 2016;13:581-3.
22. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D590-6.
23. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 2011;12:R60.
24. Li M, Kopylova E, Mao J, et al. Microbiome and lipidomic analysis reveal the interplay between skin bacteria and lipids in a cohort study. Front Microbiol 2024;15:1383656.
25. Grice EA, Kong HH, Conlan S, et al. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science 2009;324:1190-2.
26. MacGibeny MA, Adjei S, Pyle H, et al. The skin microbiome in dermatologic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2025;93:339-48.
27. Sun C, Hu G, Yi L, et al. Integrated analysis of facial microbiome and skin physio-optical properties unveils cutotype-dependent aging effects. Microbiome 2024;12:163.
28. Pérez-Losada M, Crandall KA. Spatial diversity of the skin bacteriome. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1257276.
29. Kurokawa I, Danby FW, Ju Q, et al. New developments in our understanding of acne pathogenesis and treatment. Exp Dermatol 2009;18:821-32.
30. Chen Q, Liu C, Tao J, et al. Insights into microbial dysbiosis and Cutibacterium acnes CAMP factor interactions in acne vulgaris. Microb Genom 2025;11:001449.
31. Sun L, Wang Q, Huang J, et al. Disrupting the balance: how acne duration impacts skin microbiota assembly processes. Microbiol Spectr 2025;13:e0260324.
32. Dessinioti C, Katsambas A. The microbiome and acne: perspectives for treatment. Dermatol Ther 2024;14:31-44.
33. Biazzo M, Pinzauti D, Podrini C. SkinDuo(TM) as a targeted probiotic therapy: Shifts in skin microbiota and clinical outcomes in acne patients. Int J Mol Sci 2025;26:5000.
34. Huang C, Zhuo F, Han B, et al. The updates and implications of cutaneous microbiota in acne. Cell Biosci 2023;13:113.
35. Raza ML, Ali SI, Bhojani A, et al. Microbiome modulation in dermatological disorders: Current insights and therapeutic prospects - A narrative review. Microb Pathog 2025;208:107940.

How to Cite



1.
Tu XM, Nguyen PT, Nguyen TN, Nguyen LTT, Tran DN, Huynh PX. Full-length 16S rRNA metabarcoding characterization of facial skin microbiota in acne patients: a case study in the Mekong Delta of Viet Nam. Dermatol Reports [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 29 [cited 2026 Jul. 15];. Available from: https://journals.pagepress.net/dr/article/view/10643